|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A healthy dose of paranoia?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"We all like to think we’re open-minded. Not so open-minded as to let our brains slip out, naturally, but willing to judge others on their merits and to presume those folks are people of good will." ...
"Or take today’s main example, gun control. Most people who want to ban Americans from owning guns simply wish to halt the killings. And — contrary to what a letter writer from Tecumseh wrote a few weeks ago — I don't seek to mislead people into thinking any gun control advocate would want to storm our houses in the middle of the night and take our antique firearms."
"At least, I didn't until a few weeks ago. Tecumseh letter writer, meet Dan Simpson." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|