|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Carrying a defensive firearm should not require surrendering one's privacy
Submitted by:
Bruce Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The legislatures of both Tennessee and Oregon appear poised to take long-needed steps to protect the privacy of carry permit holders. While some states (including Missouri) keep licensees' data private, many others do not, so far. Changing that is as much a privacy rights issue as a gun rights issue." ...
"The Senate sponsor of the legislation has said that he might bring it up for a Senate vote as early as next week."
"Even before Monday evening's passage (by a landslide) in the House, the editorial board of the Memphis Commercial Appeal was not happy." ...
"Cleverly, the paper paints it as an issue of open government, rather than of personal privacy. Who, after all, would be opposed to government transparency ..." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Resistance to sudden violence, for the preservation not only of my person, my limbs, and life, but of my property, is an indisputable right of nature which I have never surrendered to the public by the compact of society, and which perhaps, I could not surrender if I would. — JOHN ADAMS |
|
|