|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
punch
(2/28/2015)
|
"... gun owners don’t have a right to specific types of firearms, U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller in Sacramento said in her ruling."
The second amendment is not a permission slip. It tell Da Judge Kimberly not to infringe. Infringing is when you tell me what I may or may not purchase. |
| Comment by:
jac
(2/28/2015)
|
| I sick of these liberal judges imposing their beliefs instead of ruling in accordance with the constitution and the law. |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(3/1/2015)
|
| Wouldn't the requirement to identify "your" brass in the event of criminal actions actually be a violation of the Right against self incrimination similar to the US v. Hayes Supreme Court decision? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
