|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IN: Codifying right to hunt
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://home.comcast.net/~bruce.krafft/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"It’s no secret that hunting and fishing are an institution in the Midwest."
"It bonds work buddies in wooded areas and on lakes during the weekend, is a family tradition in some households, a source of food for others and an economic well for states."
"As hundreds of thousands of residents apply for hunting and fishing licenses annually, it is an activity that continues to go strong in the area."
"But fearing that animal rights activists are campaigning to try to eradicate the centuries-old activity in the states, two Republican state lawmakers in Ohio and Indiana have or are planning to introduce legislation that would add an amendment to each state’s constitution guaranteeing the right to hunt and fish." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|