|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: NRA-Branded Insurance Program Is Unlawful, New York Regulators Say
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A National Rifle Association-branded insurance program unlawfully provided liability coverage to gun owners in the event they were charged with a crime involving their firearms, according to New York state regulators.
Lockton Cos., which administered the insurance, and an affiliate were fined $7 million by New York’s Department of Financial Services and will no longer participate in the NRA’s “Carry Guard” program in the state of New York, the agency said in a statement Wednesday. |
Comment by:
netsyscon
(5/3/2018)
|
Well one ammo maker won't sale to NY. Now all the rest need to follow suit. By the time were done, they will be tossing rocks at each other.
Oh you New Yorkers, there are other places in this great nation to live without all the high taxes. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/3/2018)
|
I'm confused. How can it be illegal to provide insurance for self-defense, if self-defense itself is legal? |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/3/2018)
|
NRA should never have undercut USCCA the way they did anyway - some bean counter saw a way to make a buck and did not cover all the bases. I'm an NRA Benefactor member but my carry insurance will always stay with USCCA. Woulda thought Lockton's lawyers woulda seen the pitfalls though. But hey, it's NY ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|