|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Ron Paul Calls to Abolish the ATF
Submitted by:
Red's Trading Post Inc.
Website: http://www.redstradingpost.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "This Week's GUNWEEK reports the following two stories:"
"Ron Paul Calls to Abolish the ATF Presidential candidate Ron Paul's address to this year's GRPC (Gun Rights Policy Conference), called for abolishing the federal gun police, the ATF. 'I don't even like the ATF,' Paul said. 'I'm not looking ... to enforce these laws ... that I don't even believe in.' The news story also noted that, while Paul admits 'I don't pretend I hunt and shoot guns a lot,' he does own a few and his commitment is philosophical and Constitutional: 'My issue is the political reality and the importance of the Second Amendment for defending one's self against all forms of danger, including our own government if necessary.' ..." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|