|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OR: LCC revisits policy on concealed guns
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://home.comcast.net/~bruce.krafft/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"People with concealed-weapons permits will be able to carry guns on the Lane Community College campus under a policy change being considered by the school's board of education." ...
"The proposed change - which has dismayed some LCC employees who want a tougher ban - will get its first review at a meeting that starts at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday at LCC's Florence center, 3149 Oak St."
"An earlier draft of the LCC policy would have required those with concealed-weapon permits to keep their guns unloaded and leave them locked in their cars. LCC scrapped that idea after further review by the college's attorney, who said state law doesn't appear to give the college the authority to ban legally concealed guns." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|