|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AZ: Another view on the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "Half way through eating our sundae, a young man in his mid 20s entered and sat down and began to text on his cell phone and look around the place. He was wearing a loaded gun on his hip and though he probably was waiting for his order to come up, his presence made me very nervous. I’m sure he was exercising his Second Amendment rights or maybe just showing off, but his presence made me so nervous that I took my wife and daughter out to the car to finish our ice cream. Am I supposed to feel comfortable when a complete stranger whom I do not know his motivations or disposition is in the same confined space as me while he is packing a weapon?" ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
