|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
No need today to allow concealed carry
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.freelibertywriters.com/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The cities, counties and states have outdated laws on their books that seem completely absurd today. Like a family of six will no longer be allowed more than one cow within city limits. Or anyone who allows water to sit in his/her yard two hours after a thunderstorm will be subject to jail."
"Others we bend to suit the will of the masses and reinstate it as law. So it can be said about the Second Amendment. It was never meant as a concealed carry law. Gun lobbyists backed by the powerful NRA twisted the outdated amendment to get more people to join their organization and buy more guns." ... -------
Submitter's Note: No, if we were using the Second Amendment as a "concealed carry law" we wouldn't need a law! |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|