|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Philippines: Anti-death penalty activist slain
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://home.comcast.net/~bruce.krafft/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A former student activist was summarily executed while on his way to attend a human rights conference in Bajada in Davao City on Tuesday."
"Rashid "Jun" Manahan, 27, ... was the 66th person slain this year alone by a shadowy vigilante group that has since been dubbed the 'Davao Death Squad'." ...
"Police investigators said Manahan was walking toward Ponce Suites at the Doña Vicenta Subdivision in Bajada around 12:20 p.m. to attend a forum on the death penalty and summary killings in Davao City when two men on board a Honda Wave motorcycle with plate number LFA-119 shot him several times before speeding off."
"Four empty shells from a caliber .45 pistol were recovered from the crime scene." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|