
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Florida Democrats on Capitol Hill Bring Out Gun Control Bills
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
This week, two Democrats representing Florida on Capitol Hill brought out gun control measures.
U.S. Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., brought out the “Law Enforcement Protection Act” which would expand background checks on “armor-piercing, concealable weapons.”
The congresswoman’s office offered some of the details on the bill on Wednesday.
“The Law Enforcement Protection Act would add armor-piercing, concealable weapons as a category under the National Firearms Act (NFA). |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/17/2021)
|
This man obviously knows nothing about firearms other than hating them.
There is no such thing as “armor-piercing, concealable weapons.”
Ammunition is armor-piercing; the firearms are not.
A deer rifle can chamber armor-piercing ammunition. In fact, most rifle calibers will pierce body armor. Does that make a Winchester 94 an “armor-piercing” weapon? A typical handgun can chamber armor-piercing ammunition. Does that make a Beretta 92FS an “armor-piercing, concealable weapon?”
This kind of idiocy passes for “good governance” in Democrat/liberal circles and the MSM.
But it is just that; idiocy. And not only should it not be introduced into the legislature for consideration, it shouldn’t be considered by anybody at all. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy ... censorship. When any government, or any church, for that matter, undertakes to say to it's subjects, 'This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." --Robert A. Heinlein, "Revolt in 2100" (Pg. 68-69, Baen Books paperback edition, 1999 printing) |
|
|