by Dr. Michael S. Brown
public policy discussions have become so bitter and divisive as the endless
debate over guns. None is so
burdened with contradictions and misinformation.
The dictionary defines a paradox as, "something or someone with
seemingly contradictory qualities or phases". Here
are seven paradoxes that have developed during the course of this conflict:
are usually at a physical disadvantage when confronted by a male attacker and
violence against women has been a major societal issue.
Some women have discovered that a firearm combined with training is a
true equalizer. They have taken steps to educate themselves and safely provide
for their own security. However, many women reject this opportunity.
They seem to accept the concept that guns are evil and promote violence.
Thus, those who could benefit most from gun ownership are least likely to own
Police Chiefs are famous for blaming crime on "guns flooding the
streets", and generally support more gun control.
However, rank and file police officers are overwhelmingly opposed to
stricter laws. Why the
disagreement? Most Police Chiefs
are political appointees selected by the Mayor.
Most Mayors favor stricter gun laws and would be unlikely to choose or
keep a Chief who disagreed. Officers
who work on the streets are much more practical. They know they can't be everywhere at once and are
usually limited to processing crimes after they have occurred.
Unlike the Chiefs who are surrounded by tight security and VIPs, officers
who work on the streets know all too well what the world is like for the rest of
Celebrities and politicians who promote gun control are the ones who don't need
to protect themselves. They have
access to the best bodyguards that money can buy.
Even if the strictest imaginable gun laws are enacted, they will still be
protected by armed men.
4. As a
result of state laws passed in recent decades, citizens in 31 states are now
entitled to concealed weapons permits if they have a clean record and fulfill
various requirements. Data
gained from this change has provided important new knowledge for gun law
discussions. To the great surprise
of anti-gun groups, it turns out that permit holders are far less violent than
the general population. Even more
significant is the fact that crime decreased in the areas where permits were
made available. As one researcher
put it, "more guns, less crime".
Criminals victimize minorities at a much higher rate than the general
population, yet many gun control efforts such as buy-backs and neighborhood
sweeps of low income areas are aimed at reducing gun ownership by minorities.
This paradox has operated as long as human history.
Immigrants, political dissenters and ethnic minorities have been disarmed
many times by governments seeking to bring them under tighter control.
They are always told that its for their own good.
position that gun issues have assumed in the political spectrum creates a very
interesting and hotly debated paradox. Liberals,
who defend the right of a woman to have an abortion, would deny her the use of a
firearm to protect herself and her family.
Conservatives, who typically support a woman's right to kill an attacker,
would deny her the right to terminate a pregnancy.
Both sides base their arguments on the sanctity of life.
7. The seventh paradox is the most profound. Gun control
simply does not work as crime control. Case
after case shows that when cities, states and nations implement gun control,
crime goes up. Washington, Chicago,
New York, Australia, Britain; the list is long and getting longer as the
seductive appeal of gun control spreads. The
reason that gun control doesn't work is obvious, but often ignored in the
emotional rush to pass more gun laws. Criminologists
explain that disarming the law-abiding population only makes life easier for
criminals who are going to ignore the law anyway.
No other major political issue is so plagued by paradoxes.
They arise from a variety of sources that could serve as a list of
societal ailments; racism, sexism, classism, political corruption, excessive
media influence, fear of the unknown, and honest disagreement.
Whichever side you choose to support, it is
fascinating to observe the debate.
Dr. Michael S. Brown is an optometrist in Vancouver, WA who moderates a
large email list for discussion of gun issues in Washington State. You can reach
the rest of his archive here.
He may be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org