Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 734 active visitors Thursday, May 23, 2024
Main Email List:

State Email Lists:
Click Here
Join/Renew Online
Join/Renew by Mail
Make a Donation
Magazine Subscriptions
KABA Memorial Fund
Advertise Here
Use KABA Free Email




Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?

Current results
Earlier poll results
4739 people voted



» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions



Keep and Bear Arms


Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item

What is the Answer?

From: robert n lyman <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:26:41 -0800 (PST)
To: <>
Cc: <>
Subject: "Workplace bad enough without a gun around"

Regarding your article in the St. Petersburg Times, Columns: Workplace bad enough without a gun around

Mr. Gildewell,

Your Oct. 28 column seems calculated to provoke an angry response from the gun-rights community. I will attempt to be more polite than my own anger ought to allow.

Let us leave the Constitution aside for a moment and look at your factual premises. You imply that guns in city buildings will inevitably result in fatal shootings over trivialities and political differences of opinion. Do you have any evidence to back up this assertion? Are fist fights or knife fights common among city employees? If guns have been permitted up until now, have there been many shootings?

It seems to me that you make the (utterly false) assumption that people who are not ordinarily violent will become so if they are allowed to carry a firearm. Does Florida's experience with concealed-carry reform support this view? (In case you don't know, the answer is an unequivocal NO). Does the nationwide practice of arming police officers turn all of them into murderers? Obviously not. If people are not currently engaged in using physical violence to settle disputes over stoplight timing, it is exceedingly unlikely that the mere presence of a gun on one or more belts will cause such violence to erupt. I suspect that your fear of guns in city offices comes from a secret prejudice against gun owners. I can see no other reason to fear the decent people who work in city offices. Can you refute that charge?

Finally, you say, "I'm sure that Zephyrhills City Hall gets its share of walk-in crazies, including some who aren't on the City Council, but armed city employees aren't the answer." What is the answer, then? Should the employees facing an armed criminal simply lay down and die? Should they wait for police response -which might take several minutes, more than enough time for the "walk-in crazy" to kill 20 people? Oh, and by the way, do you favor disarming cops who come to the city's offices, or just employees? Why should self-defense be a privilege reserved just for those who wear badges?

The Constitution has nothing to do with it. Banning lawful concealed carry in city offices will only make them an even more tempting target for violent criminals angry at the city. Allowing it poses no risk so long as the armed employees meet the same requirements that other concealed-carry licensees meet. There is no reason to attack law-abiding gun owners in this shameful and counterproductive way.

Robert Lyman

To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.

Printer Version

Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 46

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks., Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy