Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 314 active visitors Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Main Email List:

State Email Lists:
Click Here
Join/Renew Online
Join/Renew by Mail
Make a Donation
Magazine Subscriptions
KABA Memorial Fund
Advertise Here
Use KABA Free Email




Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?

Current results
Earlier poll results
4721 people voted



» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions



Keep and Bear Arms


Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item

Pellet Gun Not Dangerous?

Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:59:54 -0800 (PST)
From: robert n lyman <>
Subject: "'Firearm' was a pellet gun" (fwd)

To the Editor, Seattle PI,

I am writing to correct two dangerously false statements in your Jan. 8 article regarding the Jan. 6 shooting of an armed man in the University district.

"...[The suspect's gun] was not designed to shoot bullets, but [was] a pellet gun."

Pellet guns ARE designed to shoot bullets, of course. Bullets are the projectiles expelled from the muzzle of a weapon. Pellet guns do not fire rounds encased in metallic cartridges, often erroneously referred to as "bullets," but they most certainly do fire small metallic projectiles at very high speed (caseless ammunition).

The second error is far, far more serious and merits a published correction.

"...[Police Chief Kerlikowske showed the] striking similarities between an instrument that can take a life, and one that cannot."

This statement is utterly, completely, and egregiously false. A pellet or BB gun can most assuredly be used, by a criminal or a fool, to take a life. There are documented cases of bullets fired from modern airguns penetrating human skulls and killing people. Even a lower-powered air pistol, as was most likely involved here, can easily puncture the arteries of the neck, or damage the windpipe enough to allow blood to fill the lungs. To be sure, the Colt 1911 displayed by Chief Kerlikowske is a far more effective tool for killing (having been the Army's sidearm for 80 years), but to say that a pellet gun is NOT a deadly weapon is simply irresponsible. I am aghast.

Personally, I believe the actions of the police (killing the suspect with a head shot) would have been perfectly justified EVEN IF they had known all along they were faced with a pellet gun. He posed a clear and imminent threat of death or severe injury to his hostage. Your article contains a clear implication to the contrary, on the basis of the erroneous belief that a pellet gun is somehow not dangerous. Your paper almost never gets reporting on the subject of guns correct. It seems your reporters know almost nothing about the subject, and it is quite clear that your editorial writers have a sort of negative knowledge, which sucks facts out of the room and makes people standing near them more ignorant. Considering there are perhaps 8-10 gun stores in your local calling area, along with literally 100,000 gun owners and hundreds of front-line police officers (real cops, not the politically-motivated brass), what can your excuse possibly be?

Robert Lyman
607 NW 88th St
Seattle, 98117
(206)7xx-xxxx (H)
(206)5xx-xxxx (W)

P.S. (Not for publication) I am perfectly willing to introduce your reporters and editors to gun safety and marksmanship, as well as serving as an unpaid consultant on technical issues involving firearms. The next time you need facts, or if you would like to learn more for the purpose of improving your reporting, do not hesitate to call me!

To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.

Printer Version

Some of the worst abuses of government force in recent years were precipitated by technical and victimless gun-law violations. For example, the BATF claimed that the Branch Davidians possessed machine guns without paying the required federal tax and filling in the proper registration forms. So a tax case worth less than $10,000 led to a 76-man helicopter, machine gun, and grenade assault on a home in which 2/3 of the occupants were women and children. Dave Kopel and Dr. Michael S. Brown, Prohibition Fever,

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks., Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy