
|
Growth in Self-Defense Insurance Amid Legal Concerns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The self-defense insurance market in the U.S. has surged, with approximately 2 million Americans currently enrolled in various plans, a number that has doubled in just five years. Offered by companies like the US Concealed Carry Association and US Law Shield, these policies provide legal support in cases of firearms-related incidents, covering everything from attorney fees to crime scene cleanup. |
En Banc Ninth Circuit Upholds Non-Violent Felon Gun Ban
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The government can permanently disarm non-violent felons despite the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court has ruled. On Friday, an en banc panel for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed defendant Steven Duarte’s conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The panel claimed that both Supreme Court dicta and the country’s historical tradition of weapons regulation support the “permanent and categorical disarmament” of all convicted felons.
|
Abolishing the ATF isn’t enough to protect gun rights
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A perennial front-runner in the race for most despised federal agency, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has reemerged as a top target during the first 100 days of the second Trump Administration. There have been hirings, firings, two acting directors, several resignations, and more than a couple of questionable anti-gun legal positions.
|
U.S. Attorney’s Office Urges First Circuit To Deny Gun Rights To Noncitizens
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
On May 8, the First Circuit Court of Appeals was asked to consider a case in which a Dominican migrant living in Puerto Rico was convicted under the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), prohibiting noncitizens from possessing firearms. At the heart of the case, the First Circuit will need to decide whether or not immigrants lacking permanent legal status are part of “the people” Constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment.
|
Senators Grassley, Ernst on Warpath v. ATF in Letter to Bondi
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Alleging a pattern of “gross and substantial waste, fraud and abuse, as well as potentially criminal false certification of government records and whistleblower retaliation” involving two senior officials at the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst want Attorney General Pamela Bondi to take “immediate corrective action.”
|
Grassroots Judicial Report—May 14, 2025
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
What’s New—Snope v. Brown and Ocean State Tactical v. Rhode Island scheduled for conference of May 15; Smith & Wesson v. Mexico: Case 22-1823: To be decided within the next two months; Wolford v. Lopez: scheduled for conference on June 4; Wehr-Darroca v. D.C: large capacity magazine ban; Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|