|
|
Giffords State Scorecards Wilts Under Data’s Light
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
For 15 years, the annual Giffords “Gun Law Scorecard” has been promoted as a definitive ranking of states doing the most to keep their citizens safe from criminal misuse of firearms. Legislators cite these scores during hearings; activists use them as “proof” of policy successes and media outlets repeat the grades ad nauseam without a second thought. |
Boasting Custom Touches, Craft Holsters Covering the Bases
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The holster arrived in a black fabric bag, inside of a cardboard box, with some reading material about breaking in the rig and maintenance tips.
This holster came from Craft Holsters, which is enjoying growing visibility online, and has been sending me frequent emails offering additional holster care products and information on materials. According to their information, Craft Holsters are built with Italian leather, which is tanned with natural vegetable oils, stitched with German threads and finished by hand. |
KelTec PR-5.7 Concealed Carry: 500+ Hours Later
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I’ve been carrying KelTec’s ultra-lightweight PR-5.7 pistol every single day for more than a month, and I’m convinced this peculiar gun is flying way too far under the radar.
Sure, it’s a quirky design chambered in 5.7x28mm with a rotary barrel and stripper-clip-fed internal magazine. Yet, on paper, the KelTec PR-5.7 appears to be a near-perfect candidate for concealed carry. It’s extremely lightweight, thin, and easy to shoot, while still offering a 20+1 capacity in an affordable package. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
