|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(5/29/2015)
|
| How's this for a fix? Add, "...persons openly carrying holstered handguns retain all of the protections incident to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution." |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/29/2015)
|
An even better fix would be to eliminate the requirement for a concealed carry license for open carry. Then LEO would not have to stop someone to see their permit because a permit would not be a requirement.
Pennsylvania and quite a few other states have no license requirement for open carry and have not experienced any problems by the people engaged in open carry. The only problem seems to be when some homophobe calls the police and the police respond aggressively and illegally to disarm the innocent individual. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
