|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Stand Whose Ground? How Guns Are Marketed To Women.
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Many people see gun rights and gun regulation as a black-and-white issue — you’re either pro-gun or anti-gun. When it comes to women’s self defense, though, those lines get blurry. In the second of a two-part story, we look at how guns are marketed to women as protection from violence … and at what can happen when a woman fires a gun to protect herself. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/26/2019)
|
Yadda yadda yadda.
'Studies', huh?
An FBI study shows that women who resist with a firearm are far less likely to be killed or injured than those who don't.
But that doesn't fit the narrative, eh? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
