|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Several residents voice concerns over shooting range expansion at Pugsley
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A shooting range could be expanded in Grand Traverse County and people who live nearby are not happy about it.
Nearly a dozen people voiced their concerns over the Brownfield Plan at the Grand Traverse County Commission Meeting Wednesday morning.
“Unfortunately, no matter where you try to put a facility like this, you’re going to have a 'not in my backyard mentality,'” Commissioner Sonny Wheelock said.
Right now, Grand Traverse County Commissioners are on track to buy 20 acres of land at the former Pugsley Correctional Facility in Grand Traverse County.
But before that happens, commissioners are being asked to approve the Brownfield Plan.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/21/2020)
|
Do they have the same 'concerns' at Wednesday? How about at Uncle Fester?
HAW-HAW-HAW!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
