|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: Monadnock Rod and Gun Club must Halt Shooting Events
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Don’t bring your guns to town — or at least not to the Monadnock Rod and Gun Club range as it’s been shut down due to a cease-and-desist order from Town Hall. Peterborough Deputy Town Administrator Nicole MacStay said this week the club appears to have been expanding its firearms range in violation of zoning rules, constructing at least one building without a permit and backfilling wetlands. Each violation could have been avoided had club leadership initially checked with the town, she said. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/19/2018)
|
"town officials became aware of the alleged violations at the club"
Yeah? HOW did they become 'aware'? Some meddlesome busybody sticking her nose where it doesn't belong?
There ought to be a "anti-busybody" law on the books with public whipping as the punishment. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
