|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
How U.S. guns fuel violence south of the border
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Communities across the West are feeling whiplash after President Donald Trump announced and then delayed steep tariffs on many Mexican goods — for the second time in two months.
Since his first days in office, Trump has used the threat of tariffs to pressure Mexico to do more to stop drug smuggling and migration into the United States. But in negotiations, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has focused on the U.S. product fueling both of those phenomena: guns. |
| Comment by:
Judge100
(3/15/2025)
|
For a more nuanced explanation of what's going on south of the border, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smuggling_of_firearms_into_Mexico
The bottom line is that ATF told Mexico to submit for tracing only arms which indicated they were manufactured in America or had U.S. import markings. The guns ATF was able to trace to the U.S. constituted only 12% of illegal guns seized by Mexico and only 40% of those submitted for tracing. Guns and grenade launchers are smuggled in through Guatemala. 8% of the Mexican military deserts each year, which is another source for guns. 20% of legal sales to the Mexican Military and police end up with the cartels. Surprise! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
