|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
sheldonsthomas
(2/26/2016)
|
Nothing actually changed, merely shuffled the wording. See SB 130 2016 (4)(b): (4) Any person who recreationally discharges a firearm
15 outdoors, including target shooting, in an area that the person
16 knows or reasonably should know is primarily residential in
17 nature and that has a residential density of one or more
18 dwelling units per acre, commits a misdemeanor of the first
19 degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This
20 subsection does not apply:
22 performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm;
23 (b) If, under the circumstances, the discharge does not
24 pose a reasonably foreseeable risk to life, safety, or property;
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To trust arms in the hands of the people at large has, in Europe, been believed...to be an experiment fraught only with danger. Here by a long trial it has been proved to be perfectly harmless...If the government be equitable; if it be reasonable in its exactions; if proper attention be paid to the education of children in knowledge and religion, few men will be disposed to use arms, unless for their amusement, and for the defence of themselves and their country. — Timothy Dwight, Travels in New England and New York [London 1823] |
|
|
