|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(9/8/2015)
|
The last batch of gun laws didn't do anything to reduce gun crime, why do these stupid liberals believe more laws will make any difference.
And the statement, "We can protect the Second Amendment and legitimate gun owners" is an outright lie. They protected legitimate gun owners with the Safe Act by making felons out of 100,000 or so previously legitimate gun owners.
Furthermore, the miscreants that shot Mr. Gabay were probably already in jail at least once and let go under the liberals catch and release program.
Actually, Cuomo is delusional if he thinks that the criminals will obey any gun laws when the punishment is so uncertain and between bail and probation the time actually spent in prison is laughable. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/8/2015)
|
Of COURSE he does.
The sun rose in the East this morning, didn't it? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
