|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/7/2018)
|
"Common use is an activity. It's not common storage or possession. It's use. So what you said was that [assault] weapons are commonly used. They're not." - Diane What'sername
Wrong from the ground up. The right there specified is to "keep and bear", denoting two rights combined into one. The people have a right to keep arms, and they have a right to bear arms. If a person decides to keep but not bear arms, it is nonetheless protected by the amendment, Q.E.D |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/7/2018)
|
Now Phorto, don't confuse Mzzz. Feinstein with the truth.
Her head might blow up........
.....upon further reflection, I think we all should send her letters explaining the truth .... ;) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
