|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Why Are Drivers Given More Freedom Than Gun Owners?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Even ignoring that there is no constitutional provision guaranteeing a right to own and drive a car, my response to this is: “Gun owners would mostly love that.”
As they fall back a step, I explain that I do not need to have license plates on my car on private property, nor do I need a driver’s license to operate it there. There is no background check to buy a car. I do not even need a driver’s license to buy a car. I can sell a car to anyone that wants to buy it. I do not need to go to a licensed car dealer. My driver’s license is recognized in every state and even in Canadian provinces. If I want to buy a car from a dealer in Chicago, I can fly there, buy the car and drive home. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(7/3/2021)
|
"Given?" The lack of byzantine oppression doesn't mean government has "given" freedom.
The illegal tyranny of the DMV (actually the department of COMMERCIAL vehicles in all states, because contrary to your assumptions, the term "motor vehicle" legally means commercial vehicle) is the most universally hated BUT AMERICANS ARE KEPT IGNORANT OF ALL LEGAL ASPECTS.
The cliche attempt to compare cars to guns exposes the successes of the enemies of freedom on both fronts, but yes it's far worse for gun owners.
That class "D" commercial license that you didn't know is a commercial license, YES is a commercial license, merely without weight parameters like the class "A" "B" or "C." No you DON'T need a license merely to travel. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(7/3/2021)
|
| Attaching commercial plates (and yes they're ALL commercial plates) amounts to legally declaring even your non commercial automobile to be a commercial "motor vehicle." You didn't know that did you. By the way, scan through state statutes and even your state's department of commercial vehicle's poorly written manuals, and you WON'T find the term "automobile." There's a sinister reason for that. Your state's subtly dishonest DMV revolves around the term "motor vehicle" because if you declare your automobile to be a commercial "motor vehicle" then you're under their CONTROL. Like all things from government, it's all about control. No legal education means you lack control and can be led about by the nose. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
