
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/5/2019)
|
This fries me! ! ! She shot a antifa @$$h○|e to protect her husband AND SHE GETS CHARGED?!!!!!!???!??!!!!?!?!?!? IF I was on her jury I'd take 2 seconds to say NOT GUILTY then if I had a chance outside the court I would ream the D. A. up one side and down the other. I'd tell him I'd shoot an antifa thug in defense of self or family too, and if the state came after me I'd likely go ballistic on the state 'cause when BOTH the bastards and the state want you canned then there's nothing more you can lose!!!! Mayors are letting these PROfacist ass hats run a rampage and ordering the police to stand off??!????!
Antifa delende est. |
Comment by:
jac
(7/5/2019)
|
I second Mr. Townsend's comments.
These are thugs that believe the law doesn't apply to them. If the thug had a knife in his hand it was clearly self defense. Too bad that the thug survived. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|