|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/4/2017)
|
Oh, No!
A Trump appointee believes that the founders, who had just finished overthrowing their government, put the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution to preserve their right to...overthrow the government. That can't be right, why would anybody believe they'd want to do THAT? |
| Comment by:
dasing
(5/4/2017)
|
| That IS the reason for 2A! |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/4/2017)
|
This is what I was taught in eighth grade civics. That was in 1962, and it is no longer taught by the liberal educational establishment.
Just because the liberals dismiss this purpose of the second amendment, does not make it any less factual. Any unbiased student of history would come to the same conclusion. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
