|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Julianne Moore Calls for Limiting Number of Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libetyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Actress and gun control activist Julianne Moore endorsed limiting the number of firearms U.S. citizens can own during an appearance Thursday on "The View." Host Whoopi Goldberg pointed out Moore is part of "Everytown for Gun Safety," and that the group wasn't about gun control but rather about safety. "People like to talk about it as if it's a Second Amendment issue. It's a safety issue. A gun is a machine," Moore said. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/20/2017)
|
Julianne Moore's liberal idiocy calls for her to receive a good bare-bottom spanking on PPV. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(10/20/2017)
|
So, Missy, how many cars may I collect ? How many times may I vote ? How many times will you be allowed to speak out ? The answer to these and "how many guns you can have" should all be "as many as I want !". |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|