|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MO: Overland Teen Fatally Shot Himself While Taking Selfie, Police Say
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A 15-year-old boy who fatally shot himself in the chest Friday was apparently trying to take a selfie when the gun accidentally discharged, police said Tuesday. The photograph hasn’t been found — police will be asking a lab to access the boy’s cellphone — but that is the Overland police investigators’ leading theory in the death of DaMontez Jones. The teen died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to his right upper chest, and the shooting has been ruled an accident, police said. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/8/2016)
|
Ah, yes. Yet another instance where the gun "went off".
All by its lonesome, we must presume.
They're prone to do that, y'know.... |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/8/2016)
|
I don't understand how one would shoot himself taking a "selfie". You are supposed to point the camera at yourself, not the gun.
And how do they know it was an accidental discharge? Maybe it was a suicide and he was trying to take a picture of the act for posterity.
If it wasn't suicide, it was negligence, not an accident.
Follow the Cardinal rules of gun safety and you won't have these incidents:
Keep your finger off of the trigger.
Never point a gun at something you don't want to destroy.
A good reason to teach your children gun safety instead of leaving it up to them to figure it out for themselves. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
