|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/4/2017)
|
Oh, No!
A Trump appointee believes that the founders, who had just finished overthrowing their government, put the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution to preserve their right to...overthrow the government. That can't be right, why would anybody believe they'd want to do THAT? |
| Comment by:
dasing
(5/4/2017)
|
| That IS the reason for 2A! |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/4/2017)
|
This is what I was taught in eighth grade civics. That was in 1962, and it is no longer taught by the liberal educational establishment.
Just because the liberals dismiss this purpose of the second amendment, does not make it any less factual. Any unbiased student of history would come to the same conclusion. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
