|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Right to Bear Arms? Gun grabbing sweeping the nation
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "While Americans have the constitutional rights to keep and bear arms ...it is not just in California where guns are seized and destroyed illegally, attorneys charge."
"'This kind of below-the-radar bureaucratic gun confiscation is a growing Second Amendment and property rights violation problem, particularly in strict gun control states like California, New Jersey and Massachusetts,' said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the [SAF]. 'People can't afford to spend tens of thousands of dollars on legal fees to get back a $500 firearm.'"
"The [SAF]’s most recent case involves Rick Bailey ... whose entire collection of 28 firearms valued at $25,000 was seized by authorities because of an ongoing dispute with a neighbor." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/13/2015)
|
| Nothing new here to gun owners in "unfriendly" states/municipalities. We've long known/endured the risk posed by any "neighbor conflict". These most often arise when "new complaints" move in bringing all their progressive/control propensities along. Any "conflict"- regardless of cause/initiation/outcome - generally results in the gun owner losing his guns. Which was the neighbor's objective from the outset. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
