|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Exporting Kenosha's Violence
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Experts warn that Trump’s embrace of Rittenhouse, who sat in the front row at a Trump rally in January and was in Kenosha as part of a rightwing militia nominally there to protect property, could pave the way for more vigilantism in Trump’s name – and have catastrophically violent results come November.
“Trump has made the election about the idea of citizen paramilitaries, federal forces and the government administration, against looters, rioters, demonstrators and Democrats,” said Joe Lowndes, professor of political science at the University of Oregon. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/18/2020)
|
When the police fail to act to protect life and property, then it is up to the citizenry to act.
The dims brought this upon themselves. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/18/2020)
|
Rittenhouse was there to render first-aid to injured people. He was armed because Maniacal Marxists are injuring said people. And the news media is LYING -- - - - AGAIN!!!
Trump has said the media has become the peoples' dnemy. And he's RIGHT!! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/18/2020)
|
Gee, no bias in THAT story, wot?
100+ days of left wing violence = not a peep
1 incident of (documented) self defense = outrage
The author's analysis is an example of inverse reality. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
