|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Review: C. Sharps Arms ‘Oakley Target Rifle’
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
C. Sharps Arms has made what I believe is a very good move.
While this company might be best known for the heavy “buffalo rifles” they produce, they are also offering a version of their 1885 Low-wall rifle in a lighter and shorter version. This rifle is being called the Oakley Target Rifle, somewhat named after Annie Oakley, the famous “Little Miss Sure Shot” from the Buffalo Bill Wild West Shows. Miss Oakley did shoot similar rifles in her fine marksmanship demonstrations, although this new rifle by C. Sharps Arms is not a copy of an authentic Annie Oakley gun.
|
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(10/7/2026)
|
| WHY IS THIS RIFLE ONLY SHOT AT 50 YDS, SHOOT FOR TEST/SCORE AT 100 YDS....NOT REALLY GOOD SCORE AT 50 YDS SURE ITS A GOOD SHOOTER BUT COULD HAVE SHOWED HOW IT SHOT AT 100. MY RUGER 10/22 SHOOTS BETTER THAT THIS RIFLE AT 50 YS USING WILDCAT AMMO OR STINGERS.... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
