|

|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Why Trump Was & Will Be the Most Pro-2A President Since Reagan (That Includes Bump Stocks)
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When the chips were down, and the anti-gun Left came roaring with everything they had—from hysterical media campaigns to endless bills aimed at gutting your rights—one man stood like a fortress between American gun owners and a full-blown legislative apocalypse: Donald J. Trump.
And no, he didn’t just wave a red flag, fire off some tweets, or give fiery speeches at NRA rallies (though he did that too, and masterfully, and the NRA recognized Trump as the greatest political friend gun owners have ever had). He straight-up reshaped the entire judiciary into a pro-2A powerhouse, fortified the Second Amendment through smart policy moves, and held the line against radical gun-grabbers where weaker leaders would’ve folded... |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(7/17/2025)
|
| "sInS rAyGuN" huh 🙄, um REAGAN WAS THE MOST ANTI 2ND AMENDMENT PRESIDENT SINCE FDR. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|