|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MD: Honor Defense Honor Guard Approved For Sale in Maryland
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Maryland Handgun Roster Board has approved three Honor Defense pistols to be available for sale in Maryland.
The top 3 skus HG9SC, HG9SCMS and HG9SCF are now available for dealers to carry and sell to Maryland residents.
“We are pleased to be approved for sale in the great state of Maryland,” said Gary Ramey, Honor Defense president. “Maryland is an important market and this provides the opportunity for Maryland residents to own an Honor Defense pistol, the best single-stack 9 mm pistol on the market.” |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/12/2017)
|
| It is so generous of big brother to allow the ****the privilege of buying these pistols. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
