This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: Gun expert says I-1639 puts families in danger
Mark A. Taff
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
"And so, that’s an M-4 rifle. That’s an assault rifle," said Firearms Instructor Dave Kellett.
Kellett says if Initiative 1639 passes, many firearms he doesn’t believe should be considered assault rifles, will be.
And more changes would come when it comes to guns, which the pro-gun community isn’t too thrilled about, like raising the age from 18 to 21, in order to buy a semi-automatic rifle.
|Again, one provision in this monstrosity has already been ruled unconstitutional, and not only don't these ninnies care, they don't even mention it.
“3) …the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.” - D.C. v. Heller (2008)