
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/15/2020)
|
She could have politely declined to let them enter her home; she didn't.
I'm more concerned with the civics values she's (not) inculcating in her son than I am with the snitch poltroon who dropped the dime.
The "you have nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide" nonsense sounds 'reasonable,' but it isn't.
A friend of mine calls this phenomenon "Prosperity Paradox" -- the atrophied state of being so pampered and comfortable living in America that one gets soft and unwary.
Just so.
Middle America needs to butch up, and this is a disturbing example. |
Comment by:
stevelync
(6/15/2020)
|
A school administrator needs to get a parking lot visit. It's the pinnacle of Marxist arrogance to pretend that your school "authortity" extends into a private home. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|