|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(3/16/2018)
|
| You MUST mean patriots who fight anti-Americans like you!!! |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/16/2018)
|
If you can't win with facts resort to name calling.
The fact is that these guns are not going to go away even if the politicians ban them.
If you want to talk about cowards, I don't see liberals joining the military. They would rather complain and whine than face actual danger. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/16/2018)
|
Yea, calling me a coward for defending my 2A right to own my ARs is such a phantasmagorically terrific argument that I immediately gave every penny I own to various antigun organizations.
Anyone who believes the above sentence is a bigger idiot than the one who wrote the article in the linked story. ;) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
