|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(5/9/2017)
|
So why don't they jeopardize where they are allowed in other states?
Just another anti gun, anti freedom cop what doesn't respect law abiding citizens. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/9/2017)
|
| “Based on my 40 years in law enforcement, I know that when there are more guns allowed, there is more risk and less safety, which is why all the officers under my command carry bananas in their holsters, which are safe and nourishing” said Roland LaCroix, chief of campus police at the University of Maine in Orono. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
