|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: Guns in schools: No-win situation
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's the law, but that doesn't make it sensible:
If you have a license to carry a concealed weapon, you can legally bring it into a school.
The theory behind this law is ... what? That an armed citizen just might happen to be in a school when some idiot decides to shoot it up? And then that armed citizen, surely knowing the proper way to handle the weapon and to deal with an armed idiot, will gun down that armed idiot before he, or she, can kill an innocent person or more? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/31/2016)
|
" ...And then that armed citizen, surely knowing the proper way to handle the weapon and to deal with an armed idiot, will gun down that armed idiot before he, or she, can kill an innocent person or more?"
Surprisingly for this author, armed people HAVE indeed stopped some of those school shootings in the past, so I guess they actually DID know how to use their gun (SHOCKING!!!!) and deal with an armed idiot shooter (EVEN SHOCKIER!!!!!).
And, how about the idea that one does not give up the right to one's own self-defense simply by walking into a school? |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(1/1/2017)
|
| Proper training for school staff to carry is doable. It mainly would serve as a preventative and thus a "win - win." Theory? Deranged mass shooters only target those schools unprepared for the evil they wish to inflict. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
