|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(9/13/2019)
|
OK, so these lawmakers want to allow governments to TAKE CIVIL RIGHTS away without due process or compensation, as if there could be any adequate compensation for a person deprived of the Right to effective self defense for lack of a firearm who is murdered by the ex-boyfriend (ex-girlfriend, estranged spouse, etc.) who filed the original complaint in order to disarm their intended victim, or a surprised homeowner answering the door to a cadre of police demanding his firearms. It it costs even ONE LIFE, this monstrosity of Red Flag Laws, is it worth it?
.
Wait a minute... it already has cost a life, hasn't it?
.
Red Flag Laws killed Gary J. Willis, and Nadler and his ilk care not at all. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/13/2019)
|
Oh, but you're missing the point xqqme -
According to Nadler, Gary J. Willis wasn't an "innocent" victim. He was a white male gun owner. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
