|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Pro-Georgia Gun Permit Bill Advances Amid Charleston Senator’s Filibuster
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The state Senate worked past midnight Wednesday, after Sen. Marlon Kimpson began his attempt to block the advancement of a bill that lets South Carolina recognize Georgia’s concealed weapons permits. Kimpson, D-Charleston, was forced to start his filibuster against the bill when several attempts to end the day’s session late Tuesday failed. The bill ultimately cleared another hurdle, but senators voted to delay debate on the amendments to the third and final vote. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/1/2016)
|
| That there nigra needs to siddown and shaddup. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(6/1/2016)
|
The Democrap Party IS the party of gun control and gun bans.
If you're a gun owner and you're voting for a Democrap, you are no different than a Jew who would have joined a Nazi SS Division because you believe in the cause. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
