
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NYS Gov. Cuomo Sentries Refuse to Accept Federal Lawsuit Papers
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Wherein a number of governors across the United States have been successfully sued recently by various parties for overstepping their gubernatorial and Constitutional powers during the coronavirus crisis, totalitarian NYS Governor Andrew Cuomo has found a simple solution to that annoying problem – merely don’t allow yourself to be served. On June 11, 2020, 2ANYS, a New York-based Second Amendment advocacy group, attempted to serve Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York State Police Superintendent Keith Corlett with notification that they are subjects of a federal lawsuit. NYS Capital Building security personnel refused to accept lawsuit papers on Cuomo’s behalf, or attempt to contact members of his staff who could properly accept the documents. |
Comment by:
stevelync
(6/24/2020)
|
I'm trying to decern the difference between the NYSP and the Schutzstaffel and I can't find any. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|