|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Silencing doctors about guns antithetical to their job
Submitted by:
Bruce W Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"After reading the Aug. 3 editorial, 'Florida’s ‘Docs vs. Glocks’ ruling takes a bullet,' I have come to a couple of conclusions:"
"1. Gun owners who take offense at pediatricians mentioning gun safety have no understanding of child psychology and normal child behavior."
"2. The judges of the federal 11th Circuit Court of Appeals have the same problem."
"Children are naturally curious and without fear. For this reason, we 'child-proof' our kitchen and bathroom cabinets, so kids have no access to cleaning products. We place laundry detergent pods on high shelves. We pay attention to toy recalls." ... |
| Comment by:
laker1
(8/18/2015)
|
| How about we patients question Doctors about medical malpractice errors? You know, if it saves only one child. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
