|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: Teachers Unlikely to Carry Guns as Lawmakers Eye Other Measures for School Safety
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gov. Henry McMaster and President Donald Trump have voiced support for arming teachers, but the chairwoman of a state House panel that is considering such a bill says she does not believe that is to come. Rep. Rita Allison, a Spartanburg County Republican and chairwoman of the House Education and Public Works Committee, said she believes House lawmakers are more interested in placing an officer in every school and securing front entrances to increase safety and thwart school shootings. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/7/2018)
|
They had an armed cop at the Parkland school. That worked out so well.
As long as schools are soft targets, these shootings will continue.
The only way to stop them is to remove the prohibitions against lawful concealed carry in schools and everywhere else. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/7/2018)
|
| I should add that there was also a cop at Columbine that turned turtle. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
