|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(11/30/2015)
|
The article requires a subscription to read, but I can guess what it proposes.
The reason to register drones is because it is only a matter of time before someone crashes one into an airplane or seriously injures someone on the ground. The drone will be damaged and recovered by the authorities. The only way to identify the culprit would be through registration.
Guns on the other hand are seldom left behind, and when used for criminal purposes are most likely stolen anyway.
The purpose of gun registration is not to solve crimes, but to identify gun owners when the government decides to confiscate our guns.
Furthermore, guns are covered by the second amendment. There is no such right to fly drones in public air space. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
