|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
More Self-Defense Gun Stories
Submitted by:
Rob Morse
Website: http://www.selfdefensegunstories.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Here is the news the mainstream media says never happens. Responsible gun owners defended themselves and the people they care about. Self-defense instructor Amber Kunau joined us this week to talk about three recent examples.
Were these gun owners lucky.. or were they well prepared? What can we learn from their performance? Listen and find out. (13:05)
First story- Are you armed at home in the afternoon?
Second story- Do you have a gun nearby early in the morning?
Third story- Are you armed when you go to the bank around noon?
Text and podcast available at the link. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/7/2017)
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Yz7hfPVC2s
20-30 somali males threatening rape and murder of local minneapolis/Lake Calhoun women
"Why would anyone need an assault rifle?
"This is why."
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
