|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Clinton says she’s not coming for your guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Clinton referred Trump’s repeated accusations that she plans on abolishing the Second Amendment, a claim which fact-checkers have disputed and gun rights advocates bolster with her own comments about favoring what they call Australian-style gun confiscation.
Clinton said her administration will work with responsible gun owners to pass reforms that would “keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.” |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/30/2016)
|
"Clinton said her administration will work with responsible gun owners to pass reforms that would 'keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.'"
Yea ... don't be surprised when the government decides we're all the "criminals, terrorists and all others..."
And of course, no mention of her admiring the Australian gun ban.
I don't think "they're coming for our guns" means the same thing to Clinton & cronies as it does to us.
They'd be happy banning everything other than Brown Besses and telling us, "see, you still have your guns."
Keep your powder dry. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(7/30/2016)
|
I never sent or received classified emails.
Hillary |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
