
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CT: New Haven Police are Working With ATF to Track Ghost Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertypakrpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The New Haven Police Department has seized nine so-called ghost guns this year, which is almost three times the number seized by this time a year ago. Although police have these guns in their possession, it’s difficult to find who they belong to because of their nature. Police Sergeant John Finch said ghost guns consist of all different parts that people then put together, which makes them hard to track. |
Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(10/27/2021)
|
not against law to build your own firearms, these so called ghost guns were in possession of criminals, they cant have any firearms by law. 400 million firearms in the us, extremely small number of so called ghost firearms are in position of gun owners, what is that a millionth of a fraction of one percent.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|