
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Some people still seem to think that Second Amendment rights are unlimited
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"I came across an online discussion this morning about whether federal authorities have violated the Second Amendment rights of three men in North Carolina who have been arrested on weapons charges."
"These guys ... had stockpiled weapons, ammunition and tactical gear while attempting to rig home-made explosives. They were arrested ... after a month-long federal investigation."
"More than a few of the participants in the discussion I read argued that the government has no business interfering with the stockpiling of weapons, ammo and explosives. It was asserted that citizens have their Second Amendment rights to amass any kind of arsenal they might want."
"Notions like this are not uncommon. But they're wrong." ... |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/5/2015)
|
I call BS.
Tenche Cox said, "Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American … the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
Take your "mainstream of modern thought" and stick it.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. — Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833]. |
|
|